Quantum Bayesian Networks

February 6, 2016

Quantum Open Source 2016

Filed under: Uncategorized — rrtucci @ 7:31 am


Big Brother is saying: Microsoft’s “Liqui|> is closed source for your own good. Quantum open source is EVIL. Using it will harm you!”

Quantum Carly Fiorina

Quantum Carly Fiorina

Big Brother is saying: Vote for Quantum Carly Fiorina, my handpicked leader

Big Brother is saying: Vote for Quantum Carly Fiorina, my handpicked leader



On 2016, the quantum open source community will finally prevail, and you will see why future quantum computer software won’t be like “1984”



  1. Still thinking Microsoft as the ultimate evil? Ah, my friend you ‘ve been duped!



    They are only another pawn in the overall game…

    Comment by KUHULCAN — February 10, 2016 @ 11:31 pm

  2. When I first started programming, I was a big Apple fan. But then gradually I realized Apple, Microsoft, Google, Facebook, Twitter, IBM, etc., they all have their good and evil sides. Nowadays, I don’t really have favorites. So no, I don’t think MS is the ultimate evil. Actually, I rather like the XBox, Surface, and Hololens. And l like Dave W. and Matthias T., the two main minds behind Liqui|>. I just think it should be open source.

    Comment by rrtucci — February 11, 2016 @ 12:05 am

  3. Well open source sounds fine, I used to believe that too until one day I realized there was no way I could prevent the “bad guys” getting a hold on it and transmuting it in unforeseen ways! Why do you think, people are playing such games like “Chikada” or the gchq challenges people once in a while like previous Christmas to solve puzzles? The real question I am afraid is whether we are building our own Krell machine that will eventually swallow us!

    Comment by KUHULCAN — February 11, 2016 @ 4:24 pm

  4. >> Carly Fiorina

    The former leader of a computer company, who saw a video with her own eyes which does not exist ?

    >> Quantum Carly Fiorina

    The leader of a quantum computer company which does not exist (yet) ?

    Comment by wolfgang — February 13, 2016 @ 10:28 pm

  5. Hi Wolfgang. The analogy between the 2 Carly Fiorinas goes even further, but people will have to find out for themselves how this is so by comparing their records.

    What I like about this analogy is that unless I say whether I like Classic Carly Fiorina or not, it is impossible to tell whether I am flattering or insulting Quantum Carly Fiorina. My lips are sealed.

    Comment by rrtucci — February 14, 2016 @ 4:44 am

  6. >> impossible to tell
    a superposition …

    Btw and completely unrelated (?!): I think The Donald is the first quantum candidate for president, with his superposition of |Dem> + |Rep> but also |dumb> + |smart> and of course |nationalist> + |socialist> …

    Comment by wolfgang — February 14, 2016 @ 5:23 pm

  7. Last time we heard about |nationalist> + |socialist> it was sort of like this…

    Comment by KUHULCAN — February 14, 2016 @ 11:11 pm

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

Blog at WordPress.com.

%d bloggers like this: